Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Celeron E3300: comparison

Comparison of Intel Celeron E3400 and Intel Celeron E3300: key differences and a full specification table.

Key differences

Intel Celeron E3400 has a higher base clock (2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz).

Both processors match on: core count (2), thread count (2), TDP (65 W), process node (45 nm).

These are specification values: they show differences between the models but do not determine a performance winner. For a specific workload, rely on independent benchmarks.

Key specifications

ParameterIntel Celeron E3400Intel Celeron E3300
Cores / threads 2 / 2 2 / 2
L3 cache 1 MB —
TDP 65 W 65 W
Process 45 nm 45 nm

Full specification table

Differing values are highlighted. This is not a better/worse rating: numbers from different architectures are not always comparable.

Parameter Intel Celeron E3400 Intel Celeron E3300
General
Model E3400 E3300
Codename Wolfdale Wolfdale
Segment Desktop Desktop
Product line Устаревший процессор Intel Celeron Устаревший процессор Intel Celeron
Process 45 nm 45 nm
Launch date Q1 2010 Q3 2009
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Servicing status End of Servicing Updates End of Servicing Updates
Embedded options available Yes No
Use conditions PC/Client/Tablet —
CPU
Cores 2 2
Threads 2 2
Multithreading (SMT/HT) No No
Base clock 2.6 GHz 2.5 GHz
L2 cache — 1 MB
L3 cache 1 MB —
Bus speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
TDP 65 W 65 W
Turbo Boost No No
64-bit support Yes Yes
Instruction set width 64 bit 64 bit
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V 0.8500V-1.3625V
Package and thermal
Sockets supported LGA775 LGA775
TCASE 74.1 °C 74.1 °C
Security and virtualization
Virtualization (VT-x / AMD-V) Yes Yes
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d) No No
AES-NI No No
Execute Disable Bit Yes Yes
Intel Trusted Execution Technology No No
Technologies
Enhanced SpeedStep Yes Yes
Idle States Yes Yes
Thermal Monitoring Technologies Yes Yes

Other comparisons