Intel Celeron E3300 vs Intel Celeron E1600: comparison

Comparison of Intel Celeron E3300 and Intel Celeron E1600: key differences and a full specification table.

Key differences

Intel Celeron E3300 has a higher base clock (2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz) and a finer process node (45 nm vs 65 nm).

Both processors match on: core count (2), thread count (2), TDP (65 W).

These are specification values: they show differences between the models but do not determine a performance winner. For a specific workload, rely on independent benchmarks.

Key specifications

ParameterIntel Celeron E3300Intel Celeron E1600
Cores / threads 2 / 2 2 / 2
TDP 65 W 65 W
Process 45 nm 65 nm

Full specification table

Differing values are highlighted. This is not a better/worse rating: numbers from different architectures are not always comparable.

Parameter Intel Celeron E3300 Intel Celeron E1600
General
Model E3300 E1600
Codename Wolfdale Conroe
Segment Desktop Desktop
Product line Устаревший процессор Intel Celeron Устаревший процессор Intel Celeron
Process 45 nm 65 nm
Launch date Q3 2009 Q2 2009
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Servicing status End of Servicing Updates End of Servicing Updates
Embedded options available No No
CPU
Cores 2 2
Threads 2 2
Multithreading (SMT/HT) No No
Base clock 2.5 GHz 2.4 GHz
L2 cache 1 MB 512 KB
Bus speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
TDP 65 W 65 W
Turbo Boost No No
64-bit support Yes Yes
Instruction set width 64 bit 64 bit
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V 0.8500V-1.5V
FSB parity — No
Package and thermal
Sockets supported LGA775 LGA775
Package size — 37.5mm x 37.5mm
TCASE 74.1 °C 73.3 °C
Die size — 77 mm²
Transistors (millions) — 105 million
Security and virtualization
Virtualization (VT-x / AMD-V) Yes No
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d) No No
AES-NI No No
Execute Disable Bit Yes Yes
Intel Trusted Execution Technology No No
Technologies
Enhanced SpeedStep Yes Yes
Idle States Yes Yes
Thermal Monitoring Technologies Yes Yes
Optane Memory Supported — No

Other comparisons