Intel Core2 Extreme QX9650 vs Intel Core2 Quad Q6700: comparison

Comparison of Intel Core2 Extreme QX9650 and Intel Core2 Quad Q6700: key differences and a full specification table.

Key differences

Intel Core2 Extreme QX9650 has a higher base clock (3 GHz vs 2.66 GHz) and a finer process node (45 nm vs 65 nm).

At the same time, Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 has a lower TDP (105 W vs 130 W).

Both processors match on: core count (4), thread count (4).

These are specification values: they show differences between the models but do not determine a performance winner. For a specific workload, rely on independent benchmarks.

Key specifications

ParameterIntel Core2 Extreme QX9650Intel Core2 Quad Q6700
Cores / threads 4 / 4 4 / 4
TDP 130 W 105 W
Process 45 nm 65 nm

Full specification table

Differing values are highlighted. This is not a better/worse rating: numbers from different architectures are not always comparable.

Parameter Intel Core2 Extreme QX9650 Intel Core2 Quad Q6700
General
Model QX9650 Q6700
Codename Yorkfield Kentsfield
Segment Desktop Desktop
Product line Legacy Intel Core Processors Legacy Intel Core Processors
Process 45 nm 65 nm
Launch date Q4 2007 Q3 2007
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Servicing status End of Servicing Lifetime End of Servicing Lifetime
Embedded options available No No
CPU
Cores 4 4
Threads 4 4
Multithreading (SMT/HT) No No
Base clock 3 GHz 2.66 GHz
L2 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Bus speed 1.333 GHz 1.066 GHz
TDP 130 W 105 W
Turbo Boost No No
64-bit support Yes Yes
Instruction set width 64 bit 64 bit
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V 0.8500V-1.500V
FSB parity Yes No
Package and thermal
Sockets supported LGA775 LGA775
Package size 37.5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
TCASE 64.5 °C 62.2 °C
Die size 214 mm² 286 mm²
Transistors (millions) 820 million 582 million
Security and virtualization
Virtualization (VT-x / AMD-V) Yes Yes
AES-NI No No
Execute Disable Bit Yes Yes
Technologies
Enhanced SpeedStep Yes Yes
Idle States Yes Yes
Thermal Monitoring Technologies Yes Yes

Other comparisons