Intel Celeron T1600 vs Intel Celeron M ULV 723: comparison

Comparison of Intel Celeron T1600 and Intel Celeron M ULV 723: key differences and a full specification table.

Key differences

Intel Celeron T1600 has more cores (2 vs 1), more threads (2 vs 1) and a higher base clock (1.66 GHz vs 1.2 GHz).

At the same time, Intel Celeron M ULV 723 has a lower TDP (10 W vs 35 W) and a finer process node (45 nm vs 65 nm).

These are specification values: they show differences between the models but do not determine a performance winner. For a specific workload, rely on independent benchmarks.

Key specifications

ParameterIntel Celeron T1600Intel Celeron M ULV 723
Cores / threads 2 / 2 1 / 1
TDP 35 W 10 W
Process 65 nm 45 nm

Full specification table

Differing values are highlighted. This is not a better/worse rating: numbers from different architectures are not always comparable.

Parameter Intel Celeron T1600 Intel Celeron M ULV 723
General
Model T1600 723
Codename Merom Penryn
Segment Mobile Mobile
Product line Устаревший процессор Intel Celeron Устаревший процессор Intel Celeron
Process 65 nm 45 nm
Launch date Q4 2008 Q3 2008
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Servicing status End of Servicing Updates End of Servicing Updates
Embedded options available No Yes
Use conditions — PC/Client/Tablet
CPU
Cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Multithreading (SMT/HT) No No
Base clock 1.66 GHz 1.2 GHz
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
Bus speed 667 MHz 800 MHz
TDP 35 W 10 W
Turbo Boost No No
64-bit support Yes Yes
Instruction set width 64 bit 64 bit
VID voltage range 1.075V-1.175V 1.050V-1.150V
FSB parity — No
Package and thermal
Sockets supported PPGA478 BGA956
Package size 35mm x 35mm 22mm x 22mm
TJUNCTION 100 °C 105 °C
Die size 143 mm² 107 mm²
Transistors (millions) 291 million 410 million
Security and virtualization
Virtualization (VT-x / AMD-V) No No
Execute Disable Bit Yes Yes
Intel Trusted Execution Technology No No
Technologies
Enhanced SpeedStep No No
Idle States No —

Other comparisons