4365 vs AMD Opteron X2170: comparison
Comparison of 4365 and AMD Opteron X2170: key differences and a full specification table.
Key differences
4365 has more cores (8 vs 4) and more threads (8 vs 4).
At the same time, AMD Opteron X2170 has a higher base clock (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz), a lower TDP (25 W vs 40 W) and a finer process node (28 nm vs 32 nm).
These are specification values: they show differences between the models but do not determine a performance winner. For a specific workload, rely on independent benchmarks.
Key specifications
| Parameter | 4365 | AMD Opteron X2170 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / threads | 8 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Max boost clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | — |
| TDP | 40 W | 25 W |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Full specification table
Differing values are highlighted. This is not a better/worse rating: numbers from different architectures are not always comparable.
| Parameter | 4365 | AMD Opteron X2170 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Segment | Server | Server |
| Product line | AMD Opteron 4300 Series Processor | AMD Opteron X2100 Series APU |
| Product family | AMD Opteron | AMD Opteron |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Unlocked for overclocking | No | — |
| CPU | ||
| Cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Max boost clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | — |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | — |
| TDP | 40 W | 25 W |
| Memory | ||
| Memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Max memory speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.866 GHz |
| Graphics | ||
| Has integrated graphics | No | Yes |
| Graphics max frequency | — | 800 MHz |
| Package and thermal | ||
| Sockets supported | C32 | FT3 |
| TJUNCTION | 70 °C | — |
| Security and virtualization | ||
| Supported technologies | — | Graphics Core Next Architecture, AMD X86 SoC Technology |